Last year I reviewed the Clinton Administration's Internet presence
(April 1994 _DATABASE_). Now it is time to take a closer look at another
branch of the U.S. government--the legislative branch. Some members of
Congress, both the House and the Senate, have e-mail addresses. Some
have their own gopher or Web space, and campaigns are discovering the
communication potential of the Net. However, law-making is the primary
business of Congress, and it is the availability of federal legislation and
bill tracking systems that makes the Congressional resources such a
substantial network resource.
MAJOR SITES
Various segments of the government have created Internet access
points to Congressional information. The three major sites for legislative
information are the House of Rep-resentatives, the Library of Congress
and the Government Printing Office.
The House Web server (http://www.house.gov) was brought online in
early 1995. Many of the options point back to the older (in Net terms)
House gopher (gopher://gopher.house.gov). Both the gopher and the Web
offer similar resources: maps for visitors, information about the internal
workings of the House, educational resources and more. On both, the
legislative information is easily available and not buried deep in the menu
or hypertext structure. Both the Web and gopher present an interface for
searching each of the two principal legislative House WAIS server
databases: the full text of House bills and the bill status system for House
and Senate bills.
The Senate also has a gopher, at gopher.senate.gov, and by the time this
column is published, the Web server at http://www.senate.gov may be up
and running on a regular basis. However, while the Senate offers
information space for individual senators and their documents, it does not
offer the level of information about legislation available elsewhere.
The Library of Congress offers a number of different databases of
legislative information. The "Federal Legislation" menu option in the LC
Information System (telnet://locis.loc.gov) includes both descriptions and
status of legislation. The available databases go much farther back than
any of the other Net resources, to 1973. However, the only full text
available on LOCIS is for a very few, selected bills that have been passed
into law. A newer WWW offering from the Library of Congress is "THOMAS:
Legislative Information on the Internet" at http://thomas.loc.gov. In early
development stages, THOMAS already provides the full text of bills from
both chambers. The full text of the legislation is accessible by keyword
and bill number. THOMAS does not have any bill status system and the link
to the _Congressional Record_ is not yet functional, but other additions
are being planned. According to the THOMAS Home Page, "Future
enhancements to THOMAS will include adding the Library's Bill Digest
files, summaries and chronologies of legislation, and will integrate them
with the full text of bills."
The Government Printing Office (GPO) is the official source for the full
text of legislation. The House gopher and WWW obtain their electronic
copies of the bills from the GPO. Therefore, it is not surprising that the
GPO also is a source for legislation. Through the GPO Access program,
which uses WAIS for indexing and access, the GPO offers a number of
legislative databases, including the full text of bills from the 103rd and
the 104th Congress, the Congressional Record full text for 1994 and 1995,
and the History of Bills for the 103rd and the 104th Congress.
GPO Access is both a commercial and a free program. Different prices
are available, depending on which databases are chosen, starting at
$35/month for a single user of the bills databases. GPO Access is also
available for free at some depository libraries, and a few of those offer
open Internet access. The easiest of these to reach are Louisiana State
University and Georgia Southern University. Telnet to indigo.lib.lsu.edu and
log in as gpo; or telnet to gsvms2.cc.gasou.edu, log in as info and choose
GPO Access from the menu. Other depository libraries are considering the
possibility of offering the same service, and most of these use Simple
WAIS (swais) as seen in Figure 1. For a complete list of GPO Access sites,
use gopher to connect to marvel.loc.gov, and then follow these menus:
Government Information/
Federal Information Resources/
Information By Branch of Federal Government/
General Information Resources/
Government Printing Office (GPO)/
GPO Access (through Depository Library Sites)/
This listing can also be found by WWW at a rather lengthy URL, but it
does not work as well. The gopher-to-URL transformation gets confused
and the list of sites must to be deduced from the badly formed URLs.
FULL TEXT FOR BILLS
One prominent feature of the many Internet resources for legislative
information is the full text, ASCII versions of introduced legislation. Both
THOMAS and the House gopher have full text for bills from the 104th
Congress. However, the House servers only include the full text for House
bills and resolutions. THOMAS includes the bills and resolutions from the
Senate, and it also includes bills from the 103rd Congress. GPO Access
includes bills from both chambers from both the 104th and the 103rd
sessions.
Which of the three is the most up-to-date? In timeliness, both the
House servers and THOMAS lag behind GPO Access. During the time that I
compared the different services, GPO Access was two days more current
than either of the other sources. In addition, H.R. 723 was available on GPO
Access while it was missing from THOMAS and the House gopher even
weeks after the bill was introduced.
Yet for ease of use, there is no clear winner. On both the House gopher
and Web home page, the full-text bill option presents a single prompt for
search terms. Boolean searching is available, as it is on GPO Access, but
the Boolean operators must be in uppercase. The only operators are AND,
OR, NOT and ADJ. If the operator is accidentally entered as lowercase, the
operator is ignored as a stopword and the default operator, which is an OR,
is used. On the House sites and on GPO Access, the WAIS search engine's
default limit is 40 hits, and the results are ranked in order based on the
WAIS algorithms.
THOMAS uses a slightly different search engine developed by INQUERY
but the results are still very similar to WAIS. The Web form (Figure 2)
presents a more intuitive front end than the single-line WAIS query. The
first form is used for keyword searching, with a pull-down menu option
for choosing between the 103rd and the 104th Congress. Radio buttons are
available for choosing all bills, just those for which there has been floor
action, or only enrolled bills. Unfor-tunately, keyword searching is limited
to the Boolean OR, which is the de-fault. THOMAS also limits retrieval to
the first 100 hits. The THOMAS help files acknowledge the non-Boolean
limitations and the lack of a controlled vocabulary. Boolean capabilities
are being planned, and the help file suggests using the Federal Legislation
option within LOCIS for controlled vocabulary searching.
The standard Boolean capabilities of the LOCIS database are a welcome
relief from the strange ways of WAIS. Combined with the Library's
indexing of bills, LOCIS presents a more traditional option for searching
for legislation. Unfortunately, LOCIS does not contain the full-text
versions of the vast majority of bills. So, LC suggests that you search
LOCIS for specific bills and then, once you have the bill numbers, go back
to THOMAS to retrieve the full text.
THOMAS is the best option for finding a specific bill number. The House
gopher and GPO Access can also pull up a specific bill, but the rather
unwieldy adjacency operator must be used. For example, to retrieve H.R.
789, the WAIS needs to see a search such as h ADJ r ADJ 789. THOMAS
uses a form for searching by bill number, and the search statement is
much more intuitive. The same search on THOMAS is hr 789 and retrieves
all versions of the bill, including amendments. GPO Access also gives the
various versions of bills but they are labeled only with codes. Thus, a bill
that has been considered and passed by the Senate is labeled with (cps) on
GPO Access, while on THOMAS the bill is marked as "Considered and passed
by the Senate."
THOMAS is also the only option for browsing through bills by bill
number. Under the "list of bills by type" option, users first choose from
the following list:
House Bills
House Concurrent Resolutions
House Joint Resolutions
House Resolutions
Senate Bills
Senate Concurrent Resolutions
Senate Resolutions
Senate Joint Resolutions
After you choose the kind of bill or resolution, THOMAS presents the
requested legislation in straight numeric order. This section could be even
more useful if it provided an easy way to jump to the higher numbers.
Instead, THOMAS presents 100 bill titles at a time and the only navigation
button is for moving on to the next 100 titles.
One nongovernmental Web site that shows some potential for a more
elegant interface to the various bill search engines goes by the name of
Will T. Bill (http://www.unipress.com/will-t-bill.html). Will T. Bill is
simply a World-Wide Web forms interface to the House WAIS server. It
provides a fill-in-the-blank front end, with options for bill number, title,
date, sponsor and key
phrases.
TRACKING LEGISLATION
To follow a bill from its introduction to its possible passage into law,
the House Web site (and gopher) is the most current and comprehensive
source for legislation tracking. THOMAS has no bill status system (yet).
The databases on GPO Access include a History of Bills derived from the
_Congressional Record Index_ but it is not very current. The Federal
Legislation database on LOCIS covers some chronology of legislation, but
it is neither as current nor as comprehensive as the House database. LOCIS
includes floor, committee and subcommittee actions. While it is worth
checking as a backup source, the House WAIS database for bill status
should be the first choice.
The House's bill status database includes information about legislation
from both houses, while the full-text House database only includes House
bills. While it is understandable that the House would leave it up to the
Senate to load their own bills, it presents unnecessary difficulties for the
user. The bill status database solves that problem and simply includes the
status of legislation irregardless of origin. There is even a separate
database for the most recent legislative day's bill status, making this a
very current source.
As with the full-text bills WAIS database, Boolean search queries
require operators in uppercase. In addition to actions on a bill, the House
database includes references to the _Congressional Record_, report
numbers, amendments and related legislation. Figure 3 shows a brief
example of a status report for a piece of legislation that has been passed
and signed into law.
WHERE TO TURN FIRST
In a few short years, the amount of Internet-accessible information
about the current legislative process in Washington has grown
significantly. Washington watchers on the Net can now easily browse the
full text of bills and follow their progression through the legislative
process. All of the services discussed are, like practically everything on
the Internet, still under development, and each will likely see significant
improvements in the next few years. In the meantime, choosing the first
database to search depends on the specific need. LOCIS provides Boolean
searching and controlled vocabulary indexing of legislation. THOMAS
offers easy access by bill number and the full text of House and Senate
bills. But GPO Access presents the most up-to-date source for full-text
bills. And for bill status, the House home page (or gopher) is the best
choice.
SIDEBAR: Featured Sites
U.S. House of Representatives Home Page
http://www.house.gov
U.S. House of Representatives Gopher
gopher://gopher.house.gov
Library of Congress Information System (LOCIS)
telnet or tn3270 to locis.loc.gov, then choose "Federal Legislation"
THOMAS
http://thomas.loc.gov
GPO Access at Georgia Southern University
telnet://info@gsvms2.cc.gasou.edu
GPO Access at Louisiana State University
telnet://gpo@indigo.lib.lsu.edu
Will T. Bill
http://www.unipress.com/will-t-bill.html
Communications to the author should be addressed to Greg R. Notess, Montana State University Libraries, Bozeman, MT 59717-0332; 406/994-6563; Internet--greg@notess.com ; http://www.notess.com..
Copyright © 1995, Online Inc. All rights reserved.